Stoneburn Farm Ltd v Rural Air Work Ltd [2025] NZHC 267 at [21] n 4

Gault (online looseleaf ed) at SI7(6)

[SI7.02] Remedies of the seller → (6) Action for the price

Commonwealth of Australia v BW [2025] NZCA 8 at [20] n 13

Boister (2020) at [5.9]

[5.9] Appeal against eligibility decision

Commonwealth of Australia (above) at [53] n 44

Boister (2020) at [1.3]

[1.3] The application of human rights to extradition in New Zealand

Fairgray v R [2025] NZSC 6 at [14] n 15 and [21] n 21

Adams – Procedure (looseleaf ed) at [CPA200.02A(d)]

[CPA200.02A] Grounds for suppression order → (d) Real risk of prejudice to a fair trial

Peka v Te Hei [2025] NZCA 32 at [67] n 95

Adams (online looseleaf ed) at [SA32.02]

[SA32.02] The need for a causal link

Prasad v R [2025] NZHC 86 at [10] n 3

Adams – Criminal Procedure (online ed) at [CPA231.02]

See now [CPA231.01] Filing notice of application for leave or notice of appeal

T v R [2025] NZHC 310 at [8] nn 2 and 3 (judgment contains publications restrictions)

Adams – Criminal Procedure (online looseleaf ed) at [BL13.03]

[BL13.03] Matters to be considered by court

Te Amo v R [2025] NZHC 198 at [28] n 9

Adams – Criminal Procedure (online ed) at [TP24.09(2)]

[TP24.09] Conduct of the defence → (2) Recording instructions and advice

Te Amo v R [2025] NZHC 198 at [29] n 14

Finn and Mathias (3rd ed, 2019) at [11.4]

[11.4] Defence counsel’s duties

Aitken v Judicial Conduct Commissioner [2025] NZHC 190 at [17] n 12

McGechan (online ed) at JR15.04

[JR15.04] “If … it is necessary to do so to preserve the position of the applicant”

Aitken (above) at [18] n 15

McGechan (online ed) at JR15.05

[JR15.05] “The Court may … make an interim order”

Blissett v Commissioner of Police [2025] NZHC 123 at [9] n 8

McGechan (online ed) at [HR5.35A.02(2)(i)]

[HR5.35A.02] “plainly abusive proceeding” → (2) Categories of proceeding that have been considered plainly abusive → (i) Issue estoppel/collateral challenge/relitigating claims already determined

Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Kaur [2025] NZCA 5 at [49] n 36

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [SC56.01]

[SC56.01] Antecedents

D v J [2025] NZHC 266 at [19] n 4

McGechan (online ed) at [HR24.10.05]

[HR24.10.05] Court’s inherent jurisdiction to set aside bankruptcy notice

Een v Body Corporate 384911 [2025] NZHC 238 at [4(a)] n 3

McGechan (online ed) at [HRPt14.09(2)(iii)]

[HRPt14.09] Non-party costs → (2) General principles

Environmental Law Initiative v Environment Southland [2025] NZHC 191 at [210] n 75

McGechan (online ed) at [HR30.2.03]

[HR30.2.03] Mandamus

Halse v Employment Court of New Zealand [2025] NZCA 11 at [29] n 35

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR15.1.02]

[HR15.1.02] No reasonably arguable cause of action or defence

Houghton v Saunders [2025] NZHC 108 at [6] n 4

McGechan (online ed) at HR7.24.03

[HR7.24.03] Consequences of failure to file and serve notice of opposition

Houghton (above) at [18] n 25

McGechan (online ed) at HR7.42A.01–HR7.42A.02

[HR7.42A.01] Orders relating to plainly abusive interlocutory applications

[HR7.42A.02] Relationship with other strike out powers

Houghton (above) at [18] n 26

McGechan (online ed) at HR15.1.05(2)(a)

[HR15.1.05] Otherwise an abuse of process → (2) Types of abuse of process

Houghton (above) at [27] n 38

McGechan (online ed) at [HR11.9.01(1)–(12)]

[HR11.9.01] Recall

Houghton (above) at [45] n 50

McGechan (online ed) at [HR5.45.04]

[HR5.45.04] Further application and review of existing order

Husheer v Campbell [2025] NZHC 222 at [7] n 11 and [20] n 20

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR14.6.03(1)(c)]

[HR14.6.03] Indemnity costs → (1) Principles → (c) Examples of behaviour encompassed by r 14.6(4)(a)

Lincoln v Attorney-General [2025] NZHC 49 at [5] n 6

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR8.22.02]

[HR8.22.02] General rule as to expenses for non-parties

Lincoln (above) at [5] n 7

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR8.22.02]–[HR8.22.04]

[HR8.22.02] General rule as to expenses for non-parties

[HR8.22.03] Stage one: costs of application under rr 8.20 or 8.21

[HR8.22.04] Stage two: cost of compliance with order under rr 8.20 or 8.21

Lincoln (above) at [5] n 8

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR8.22.05]

[HR8.22.05] Costs against non-parties

Lincoln (above) at [7] n 9

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR8.22.03]

[HR8.22.03] Stage one: costs of application under rr 8.20 or 8.21

Lincoln (above) at [10] n 14

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR8.22.04]

[HR8.22.04] Stage two: cost of compliance with order under rr 8.20 or 8.21

Lincoln (above) at [13] n 16

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR14.1.03]

[HR14.1.03] Pre-proceeding conduct

Lincoln (above) at [13] n 17

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR14.1.05]–[HR14.1.06]

[HR14.1.05] Pre-proceeding conduct – refusal or reduction of costs

[HR14.1.06] Examples

McLaughlin v McLaughlin [2025] NZHC 353 at [36] nn 12 and 13

McGechan (online ed) at [HR14.15.02(a)] and [HR14.5.02(d)–(e)]

[HR14.15.02] Principles

To’o v Wellington City Council [2025] NZHC 216 at [18] n 6

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR12.2.07]

[HR12.2.07] Onus on defendant

Warin v Warin [2025] NZHC 67 at [9] n 10

McGechan (online ed) at [HR4.52.02]

See now [HR4.52.01] Purpose

Warin (above) at [13] n 12

McGechan (online ed) at [HR17.9.04]

[HR17.9.04] Leave

Environmental Law Initiative v Environment Southland [2025] NZHC 191 at [19] n 9

Joseph (5th ed, 2023) at 921

[22.4.1] Inarticulate premise

Halse v Employment Court of New Zealand [2025] NZCA 11 at [44] n 46

Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [21.7.1]

[21.7.1] Concept of jurisdiction

Hart v Marlborough District Council [2025] NZHC 47 at [72] n 49 (within a quote)

Joseph (online ed) at [4.6]–[4.9]

[4.6] Status of the Treaty

[4.7] Judicial ruling

[4.8] Courts and the exercise of sovereign power

[4.9] The Treaty and municipal law

Hart (above) at [185] nn 103 and 106 (within a quote)

Joseph (4th ed, 2014) at [25.5.5]

See now [25.5.6] Predetermination

inLandsAirWater Counsel v Manawatū-Whanganui LASS Ltd [2025] NZHC 351 at [7] n 2 and [12] n 8

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [CA241.03]

[CA241.03] Liquidations by the court — grounds on which an order may be made

inLandsAirWater Counsel (above) at [8] nn 3 and 4

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [CA241.02]

[CA241.02] Who may initiate a liquidation by the court

inLandsAirWater Counsel (above) at [11] n 7

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [CA241.04]

[CA241.04] Appointment of the liquidator — at court’s discretion

inLandsAirWater Counsel (above) at [18] n 10

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [CA289.02]

[CA289.02] Due debt

inLandsAirWater Counsel (above) at [28] n 19

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [CA241.03(4)]

[CA241.03] Liquidations by the court — grounds on which an order may be made → (4) Just and equitable grounds

Stoneburn Farm Ltd v Rural Air Work Ltd [2025] NZHC 267 at [21] n 3

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [CA289.02(1)]

[CA289.02] Due debt → (1) Generally

Ropitini v R [2025] NZCA 3 at [51] n 38

Mahoney (2nd ed, 2024) at [EV43.04(4)]

[EV43.04] Probative value of the propensity evidence → (4) Section 43(3)(b): timing

Hart v Marlborough District Council [2025] NZHC 47 at [58] n 30

Palmer (2nd ed, 2022) at 38

[1.6.1] Introduction

DG v PS [2025] NZLCRO 21 at [62] n 5

Todd (online ed) at [5.1]

See now [4.1] Introduction

Peka v Te Hei [2025] NZCA 32 at [87] n 115

Todd (9th ed, 2023) at [4.7.4]

[4.7.4] Primary victims

To’o v Wellington City Council [2025] NZHC 216 at [22] nn 10 and 11, at [27] n 17 and at [28] n 18

Todd (9th ed, 2023) at [22.13]

[22.13] Assignees

To’o (above) at [62] n 51

Todd (9th ed, 2023) at [4.8.6(4)]

[4.8.6] The special relationship → (4) Pre-contractual negotiations

To’o (above) at [64] n 53

Todd (9th ed, 2023) at [4.8.4]

[4.8.4] Reliance

Whakaari Management Ltd v WorkSafe New Zealand [2025] NZHC 288 at [123] n 35

Tooma (2016) at [HS20.02]

[HS20.02] Temporal limitation

Financial Markets Authority v CBL Corp Ltd (in liq) [2025] NZHC 295 at [86] n 74

Griffiths “Two market[s] share two structures: Fair dealing and enforcement” in Watson and Taylor (2018) 1111 at 1123

[37.3.3] Civil liability provisions → (2) Accessory liability, “involved in a contravention” and deemed liability

Interlogic Ltd v Wheel Pros LLC [2025] NZIPOTM 2 at [29] n 23

Mellor and others Kerly’s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names (14th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2005) at 288–294 (re amount of use required in the context of revocation proceedings)

Interlogic (above) at [89] n 61 and [92]–[93] (within quotes)

Kerly’s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names (15th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2011) at 365–366 (re fair description)

Mitchell v Attorney-General [2025] NZHC 172 at [24(a)] n 3

Garner (ed) Black’s Law Dictionary (12th ed, [United States], 2024) at 516 and 1253 (re order nisi)

Peka v Te Hei [2025] NZCA 32 at [55] n 78

Sappideen and Vines (eds) Fleming’s The Law of Torts (11th ed, Sydney, 2024) at [27.110] (re rule in Baker v Bolton)

Waimauri Ltd v Powell Junior Ltd [2025] NZHC 332 at [55] n 2

Andrews and Millett Law of Guarantees (7th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2015) at [1-014] (re construction of guarantee clause)

Waimauri (above) at [60] n 3

Andrews and Millett Law of Guarantees (7th ed Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2015) at [9-003] (re payment of guaranteed debt)

Wimax New Zealand Ltd v Fuge [2025] NZCA 31 at [70] n 42

Gaunt and Morgan Gale on Easements (21st ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2020) at [13-06]; and Dixon, Bignell and Hopkins Megarry & Wade: The Law of Real Property (10th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2024) at [29-010] (re substantial interference with right of way)

Wu v Chen [2025] NZHC 173 at [46] n 4

AS Burrows “Assignment” in HG Beale (ed) Chitty on Contracts (29th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2004) at [19-085] (re novation)