Thachankary v Rasela [2025] NZHC 1793 at [77] n 62

Marten “Exemplary Damages” in Civil Remedies in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2011) at [12.6.11]

[12.6.11] Awards involving fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and similar wrongs

Keir v Simms [2025] NZHC 2086 at [94](c)] n 83

Palmer “Constructive Trusts” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2009) at [13.2]

[13.2] Institutional constructive trusts

Keir (above) at [230] n 119

Every-Palmer “Equitable Estoppel” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2009) at 601

[19.1] Introduction

Keir (above) at [232] n 124

Every-Palmer “Equitable Estoppel” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2009) at [19.2.1]

[19.2.1] Belief or expectation created or encouraged

Keir (above) at [232] n 125

Every-Palmer “Equitable Estoppel” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2009) at [19.3.4]

[19.3.4] Representation sufficiently unequivocal

Keir (above) at [234] nn 129 and 130

Every-Palmer “Equitable Estoppel” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2009) at [19.2.2(1)]

[19.2.2] Belief or expectation reasonably relied on → (1) Belief or expectation reasonably held

Keir (above) at [235] n 133

Every-Palmer “Equitable Estoppel” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2009) at [19.2.2(3)]

[19.2.2] Belief or expectation reasonably relied on → (3) Ongoing reliance must remain reasonable

Keir (above) at [235] n 134

Every-Palmer “Equitable Estoppel” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2009) at [19.2.3]

[19.2.3] Detriment

Keir (above) at [236] n 136

Every-Palmer “Equitable Estoppel” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2009) at [19.2.4(1)]

[19.2.4] Unconscionability → (1) Introduction

Ngaruahine Iwi Authority v Mountain View Developments and Constructions Ltd [2025] NZHC 2123 at [39] n 12

Palmer “Resulting Trusts” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) at [12.5.2]

[12.5.2] Direct evidence of intention

Pyne Holdings Ltd (in rec) v Australasian Equity Partners (GP) No 1 Ltd [2025] NZHC 1802 at [71] n 9

Palmer “Resulting Trusts” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) 307 at [12.1]

[12.1] Introduction

Pyne Holdings (above) at [71] n 10

Palmer “Resulting Trusts” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) 307 at [12.5.2]

[12.5.2] Direct evidence of intention

Pyne Holdings (above) at [72] n 11

Palmer “Constructive Trusts” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) 335 at [13.2.4]

[13.2.4] Assertion made of ownership of property to which another has contributed

Qin v Awesome Home Ltd [2025] NZHC 1856 at [23] n 9

Equity & Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) at [12.5.2]

[12.5.2] Direct evidence of intention

Thachankary v Rasela [2025] NZHC 1793 at [24] n 11

McLay “Equitable Damages” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) at [32.3.1]

[32.3.1] Compensation

Thachankary (above) at [40] n 28

McLay “Equitable Damages” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) at [32.3.4]

[32.3.4] Compensation for loss of business chance

Thachankary (above) at [74] n 55

McLay “Equitable Damages” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) at [32.3.3(1)]

[32.3.3] Exemplary damages → (1) Common law

H (CA437/2021) v R [2025] NZCA 342 at [24] n 8 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Adams (looseleaf ed) [general reference]

Adams on Criminal Law

Harris v R [2025] NZCA 292 at [8] n 14

Adams – Sentencing (online ed) at [SAB5.01]

[SAB5.01] Grounds upon which appeal court may uphold appeal

Kidd v Southland District Council [2025] NZHC 2120 at [25] n 16

Adams – Sentencing (online ed) at [SA85.05]

[SA85.05] Application of totality principle generally

R v G [2025] NZHC 1743 at [73] n 37 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Adams – Rights and Powers (looseleaf ed) at [SS117.06]

[SS117.06] No power to move

R v G (above) at [74] n 38

Adams – Rights and Powers (looseleaf ed) at [SS117.03]

[SS117.03] Securing the place or items found

R v G (above) at [77] n 40

Adams – Rights and Powers (looseleaf ed) at [SS122.03]

[SS122.03] Power under subsection (2) limited to those with power of arrest

R v L [2025] NZHC 2031 at [15] n 9 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Adams – Criminal Procedure (online looseleaf ed) at [CM20.02]

[CM20.02] Insanity

R v L (above) at [16] n 11

Adams – Criminal Procedure (online looseleaf ed) at [CM4.17.01]

[CM4.17.01] Unfit to stand trial

Underhill v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [2025] NZHC 1803 at [2] n 1

Adams – Rights and Powers (online ed) at [HCSch.04]

[HCSch.04] Correct applicant

Wharepapa v R [2025] NZCA 308 at [35] n 51

Adams – Sentencing (online looseleaf ed) at [SA7]

See the “Synopsis” above [SA7.01]

Z (CA230/2025) v R [2025] NZCA 346 at [12] n 14 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Adams – Evidence (online looseleaf ed) at [EA40.02(2)]

[EA40.02] Definition of propensity evidence: s 40(1) → (2) State of mind

Birchfield v Birchfield [2025] NZHC 1928 at [17] n 6

McGechan (online ed) at [HR pt 14.16A]

[HRPt14.16A] Wasted costs

Body Corporate 172108 v Cummins [2025] NZHC 1790 at [4] n 3

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [CR12.01(5)]

[CR12.01] Principles → (5) Concurrent jurisdiction

Gordon v Pepper New Zealand Ltd [2025] NZHC 1970 at [21] n 16

McGechan (online ed) at [HR15.1.06]

[HR15.1.06] Evidence on strike out applications → (1) General approach

Guthrie v Williams [2025] NZHC 1827 at [23] n 29

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR12.2.07]

[HR12.2.07] Onus on defendant

L v H [2025] NZHC 1849 at [8] n 5 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

McGechan (online ed) at [HR7.35.01]

[HR7.35.01] Publication of decisions made in Chambers

Maiolini v Fideis (New Zealand) Ltd [2025] NZHC 1832 at [107] n 24

McGechan (online ed) at [HR19.4A.01]

[HR19.4A.01] Beddoe applications

McLeod v Kerr [2025] NZHC 2017 at [5] n 3

McGechan (online ed) [pinpoint missing]

[HR14.7.01] Specific situations justifying refusal or reduction → (e) Other reason – r 14.7(g) → (v) Financial hardship or impecuniosity

New Zealand New Oak Property Ltd v Eco Earth NZ Ltd [2025] NZHC 1809 at [28(e)] n 7 and [28(f)] n 8

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR15.23.01]

[HR15.23.01] Principles

Parashakti Ltd v Mangukiya [2025] NZHC 2101 at [4] n 3

McGechan (looseleaf ed) at [HR14.8.05]

[HR14.8.05] Summary judgment

PauaCo Ltd v Seasir Ltd [2025] NZHC 2058 at [14] n 7

McGechan (online ed) at [NR1.19.01] [sic]

See [HR1.19.01] Governing principle

R v Bell [2025] NZHC 1779 at [17] n 7

McGechan (online ed) at [SCD5.01]

[SCD5.01] Inherent powers

RIA PVT Ltd v Boatshed 15 Ltd [2025] NZHC 2091 at [22] n 12

McGechan (online ed) at [HR7.53.04]

[HR7.53.04] General principles

Ryburn v Gilbert [2025] NZHC 2013 at [14] n 7

McGechan (online ed) at [HR5.26.08]

[HR5.26.08] Paragraph (b) — factual particulars, instances → (1) Fraud, bad faith

Stills v McCormack [2025] NZHC 2023 at [77] n 14

McGechan (online ed) at [HR12.9.20]

[HR12.9.20] Discovery

The Mall Upper Hutt Ltd v Upper Hutt City Council [2025] NZHC 1878 at [3] n 2

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [15.23.04]

[HR15.23.04] Quantum

Wakefield v Network Waitaki Ltd [2025] NZHC 1973 at [15] n 6

McGechan (online ed) at [HR9.16.04] [sic]

See [HR8.16.04] Groups of documents → (1) When groups of documents appropriate

Pascoe v Environment Court [2025] NZHC 1784 at [40] n 21

Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [27.5.2(3)]

[27.5.2] Meaning of “statutory power” → (3) Judicature Amendment Act 1977

Pascoe v Minister for Land Information [2025] NZHC 1783 at [98] n 54

Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [23.3.6(5)]

[23.3.6] Rule against sub-delegation → (5) Alter ego doctrine

Z (CA230/2025) v R [2025] NZCA 346 at [12] n 14 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Mahoney (2nd ed, 2024) at [EV40.02(6)]

[EV40.02] Section 40(1): definition of “propensity evidence” → (6) Section 40(1)(a): “acts, omissions, events, or circumstances”

S v N [2025] NZFC 3122 at [56] n 30 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Family Law – Family Property (online looseleaf ed) at [PR44.01A(2)] [sic]

See [PR44.01B] Jurisdiction regarding pre-commencement and pre-relationship dispositions → (2) Dispositions made before the relationship began

Accident Compensation Corporation v D [2025] NZCA 373 at [27] nn 29–31 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Todd (9th ed, 2023) at 35

[2.2.2] The Accident Compensation Act 1972

Exciting Habitats Ltd v Veracity Develop Ltd [2025] NZHC 2062 at [58] n 3 and [60] n 4

New Zealand Land Law (3rd ed, 2017) at 1473–1475 / [13.22]

[13.22] Clause 8 – claims for compensation

Keir v Simms [2025] NZHC 2086 at [228] n 114

Mitchell, Mitchell and Watterson (eds) Goff & Jones on Unjust Enrichment (10th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2022) at [12-01] (re failure of basis)

Kirkham v Winkelmann [2025] NZHC 1999 at [38] n 6

Tucker, Le Poidevin and Brightwell Lewin on Trusts (19th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2015) at [23-048] (re legal professional privilege and joint interest exception)

Kirkham (above) at [42] n 9

Mathews and Malek Disclosure (6th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2024) at [11-96] (re legal professional privilege and joint interest exception)

Talley’s Group Ltd v Television New Zealand Ltd [2025] NZHC 2054 at [21] n 21

Parkes and others (eds) Gatley on Libel and Slander (13th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2022) at [10-032] (re traditional forms of special damage claimable in defamation cases)

Wakefield v Network Waitaki Ltd [2025] NZHC 1973 at [84] nn 19–21, [89] n 29 and [91] n 30

Passmore Privilege (4th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2020) at [6-002] n 2, [6-079] n 114, [6-076] and [6.080] (re common interest privilege)