Thomson Reuters texts cited in New Zealand cases: March 2025
Bartlett and others Employment Law (online, looseleaf, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Gouk v C3 Ltd [2025] NZERA 127 at [17] n 6 |
Employment Law (online ed) at ER114.04 |
[ER114.04] “Came to the notice of the employee” |
Butler (ed) Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (online, book, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Cooper v Cooper & Co Real Estate Albany Ltd [2025] NZHC 478 at [346] n 132 |
Butler and Every-Palmer “Equitable Defences” in Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2009) 1039 at 1059–1064 |
[38.1.4] Laches |
Downs (ed) Adams on Criminal Law (online, looseleaf, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Blackler v R [2025] NZHC 658 at [42] n 63 |
Adams (online ed) at [MD31.08] |
[MD31.08] Proof without certificate |
Curtis-Smith v R [2025] NZHC 511 at [23] n 13 |
Adams – Sentencing (online ed) at [SA9.22B] |
[SA9.22B] Subsection (2)(fb) — adverse effects on defendant due to procedural delay through prosecutorial non-compliance |
Curtis-Smith (above) at [25] n 17 |
Adams – Sentencing (online ed) at [SA9.25(4)] |
[SA9.25] Other mitigating factors → (4) Delay |
JD v R [2025] NZHC 384 at [20] n 15 (judgment contains publication restrictions) |
Adams – Criminal Procedure (online looseleaf ed) at [BL8.09] |
[BL8.09] Subsection (2)(f) — length of time until trial |
R v SM [2025] NZHC 416 at [8] n 4 (judgment contains publication restrictions) |
Adams – Procedure (online ed) at [CM8A.02] |
[CM8A.02] Burden and standard of proof |
Tana v Police [2025] NZHC 603 at [18] n 15 |
Adams – Sentencing (looseleaf ed) at [SA9.15A] |
[SA9.15A] Para (k) — failure to comply with procedural requirement |
Finch (ed) James & Wells Intellectual Property Law in New Zealand (online, book, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Burden v ESR Group (NZ) Ltd [2025] NZSC 18 at [89] n 85 |
James & Wells (3rd ed, 2017) at 410 |
[4.5.2] Economic rights → (3) Issue copies of the work to the public by sale |
Burden (above) at [100] n 96 |
James & Wells (3rd ed, 2017) |
— |
Gorman and others McGechan on Procedure (online, looseleaf, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Beggs v North Face Construction 2022 Ltd [2025] NZHC 552 at [12] n 10 |
McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR12.2.07] |
[HR12.2.07] Onus on defendant |
Beggs (above) at [14] n 12 |
McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR12.2.07(1)] |
[HR12.2.07] Onus on defendant → (1) Effect of material disputes of fact |
Bright v Wolfbrook Residential Ltd [2025] NZHC 437 at [33] n 10 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR1.2.03] |
[HR1.2.03] Plain meaning predominates |
Cain v Nikau [2025] NZHC 389 at [14] n 1 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR17.29.02] |
[HR17.29.02] Principles |
Hata v Attorney-General [2025] NZHC 519 at [96] n 34 |
McGechan (online ed) at HR4.56.04 and HR4.56.05 |
[HR4.56.04] Current approach [HR4.56.05] Striking out parties |
IRS International Pty Ltd v ContainerCo (NZL) Ltd [2025] NZHC 685 at [12] n 7 |
McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR7.53.02] |
[HR7.53.02] Object of an interlocutory injunction |
IRS International (above) at [13] n 9 |
McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [JR15.04] |
[JR15.04] “If … it is necessary to do so to preserve the position of the applicant” |
Kim v Christchurch City Council [2025] NZHC 463 at [24] n 4 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR7.7.01] |
[HR7.7.01] Leave to take steps after close of pleadings date |
Royal v Zheng [2025] NZHC 370 at [8] n 1 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR17.41.01] |
[HR17.41.01] Threshold requirement? |
Royal (above) at [8] n 2 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR17.41.02] |
[HR17.41.02] Grounds |
Save Environmentally Endangered Soil and Water Inc v Fulton Hogan Ltd [2025] NZHC 435 at [33] n 7 |
McGechan (looseleaf ed) at [7.7.01] |
[HR7.7.01] Leave to take steps after close of pleadings date |
Stanley Construction Ltd (in liq) v Stanley [2025] NZHC 717 at [9] n 2 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR4.56.07] |
[HR4.56.07] Two questions: jurisdiction and discretion |
Tadd Management Ltd v Weine [2025] NZHC 483 at [29] n 16 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HRPt14.08] |
[HRPt14.08] Third party costs |
Tautari v Thompson [2025] NZHC 522 at [24] n 2 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR7.53.05] |
[HR7.53.05] First stage of court’s assessment: “serious question to be tried” |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR9.19.03] [sic] |
[HR8.19.03] Jurisdictional requirements |
|
Wenzhou Hongliang Trading Co Ltd v Shieff Angland [2025] NZHC 698 at [20] n 8 |
McGechan (looseleaf ed) at [HR8.22.02] |
[HR8.22.02] Costs for non-parties if the Judge thinks it just |
Zheng v Fan [2025] NZHC 701 at [17] n 2 |
McGechan (online ed) at [HR12.2.11] |
[HR12.2.11] Court’s discretion |
Hille, Jones and Ward Treaty Law: Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi in Law and Practice (online, book, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Environmental Law Initiative v Director-General of the Department of Conservation [2025] NZHC 391 at [52(b)] n 24 |
Treaty Law (2023) at [1.13] |
[1.13] The principles of the Treaty in the courts since Lands |
Howes and Revill Company Law (online, looseleaf, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Cooper v Cooper & Co Real Estate Albany Ltd [2025] NZHC 478 at [6] n 5 |
Company Law (online ed) at [CA174.01] |
[CA174.01] Overview of scope of s 174 |
Joseph Joseph on Constitutional and Administrative Law (online, book, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Environmental Law Initiative v Director-General of the Department of Conservation [2025] NZHC 391 at [63] n 26 |
Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at 1263 |
[27.3.1] Nature of the remedies → (2) Prospective-only relief |
Environmental Law Initiative (above) at [114] n 45 |
Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [27.4.2(7)] |
[27.4.2] Grounds of exercise → (7) No useful purpose |
Kennedy v Body Corporate 82981 [2025] NZHC 388 at [10] n 35 (within a quote) |
Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [23.2.2(2)] and nn 43–45 |
[23.2.2] Doctrine of improper purpose → (2) Complexities in applying the doctrine |
Lawyers for Climate Action NZ Inc v Climate Change Commission [2025] NZCA 80 at [21] n 27 |
Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [19.4.2(2)] |
[19.4.2] Political prerogatives → (2) Prerogative in external affairs |
Lawyers for Climate Action NZ (above) at [21] n 28 |
Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [20.7.4] |
[20.7.4] Role |
Lawyers for Climate Action NZ (above) at [135] n 152 |
Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [26.6.2(3)] |
[26.6.2] Repugnancy → (3) Repugnancy to constitutional principle |
Te Ohu Kai Moana Trustee Ltd v Attorney-General [2025] NZHC 657 at [135] n 83 |
Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [27.3.3(2)] [sic] |
[27.3.3] Declaration → (3) Refusal of the remedy |
Optican and McDonald (eds) Mahoney on Evidence: Act and Analysis (book, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Headings of current text |
TNL International Ltd v Bullocks Freightmasters International Pty Co Ltd [2025] NZHC 564 at [35] n 8 |
Mahoney and others The Evidence Act 2006: Act and Analysis (3rd ed, 2014) |
Compare now Mahoney on Evidence (2nd ed, 2024) at [EV57.01] Overview and [EV57.05] “Without prejudice” communications |
Toomey and Burrows (eds) New Zealand Land Law (online, book, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Cooper v Cooper & Co Real Estate Albany Ltd [2025] NZHC 478 at [229] n 87 |
Brown “Leases” in [New Zealand] Land Law (3rd ed, 2017) at 734 |
[8.15.04] Equitable assignment |
Cooper (above) at [231] nn 89 and 90 |
Brown “Leases” in [New Zealand] Land Law (3rd ed, 2017) at 648 |
[8.5.02] Informal leases as agreements to lease |
Kennedy v Body Corporate 82981 [2025] NZHC 388 at [82] n 108 (within a quote) |
Tom Bennion and others New Zealand Land Law (2nd ed, 2009) at 1046 |
Compare now (3rd ed, 2017) at [12.4.01] Meetings of the body corporate and voting → (1) General meetings |
Watson and Taylor (eds) Corporate Law in New Zealand (online, book, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
Kennedy v Body Corporate 82981 [2025] NZHC 388 at [46] n 64, at [62] n 83 and at [80] n 104 |
Corporate Law (2018) at [27.2] |
[27.2] The derivative action at common law |
Tait v St Workforce Construction Ltd [2025] NZHC 460 at [32] n 7 |
Corporate Law (online ed) at [26.8] |
[26.8] Relationship of the s 174 remedy to the other remedies |
Willy and Sissons Arbitration (online, book, ebook)
Case |
Text cited |
Link to text on Westlaw |
McCracken v Boyer [2025] NZHC 546 at [21(h)] n 39 |
Arbitration (2nd ed, 2018) at [15.4.2] |
[15.4.2] Principles governing the exercise of the discretion to order costs |
Thomson Reuters texts published overseas
Case |
Text cited |
Alalääkkölä v Palmer [2025] NZSC 9 at [39] n 51 |
Garner (ed) Black’s Law Dictionary (12th ed, St Paul (Minnesota), 2024) at 29 (re “acquire”) |
Alalääkkölä (above) at [50] n 57 |
Davies and Garnett “Origins of the Theory of Moral Rights” in Davies and Garnett (eds) Moral Rights (2nd ed, London, 2016) 13 at [2-002] (re right to disclose or divulge unpublished works in common law) |
Alalääkkölä (above) at [50] n 59 |
Mercedes Frabboni “France” in Davies and Garnett (eds) Moral Rights (2nd ed, London, 2016) 415 at [13-006]–[13-028] (re five droits moraux in French law) |
Burden v ESR Group (NZ) Ltd [2025] NZSC 18 at [67] n 61
|
Harbottle, Caddick and Suthersanen Copinger and Skone James on Copyright (19th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2025) vol 1 at [1-39] (re territorial nature of copyright law) |
Burden (above) at [86] nn 81 and 82 |
Skone James and others Copinger and Skone James on Copyright (13th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1991) at [8-96] and [8-97] (re UK equivalent of s 9(1)(c) of Copyright Act 1994) |
Burden (above) at [86] n 81 |
Garnett, James and Davies Copinger and Skone James on Copyright (14th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1998) at [7-108] (re UK equivalent of s 9(1)(c) of Copyright Act 1994) |
Burden (above) at [88] n 84 |
Harbottle, Caddick and Suthersanen Copinger and Skone James on Copyright (19th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2025) vol 1 at [6-147], n 724 (re UK equivalent of s 9(1)(c) of Copyright Act 1994) |
Burden (above) at [108] n 98 |
Skone James and others Copinger and Skone James on Copyright (13th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1991) at [8-95] (re whether consent limitation in original UK equivalent of s 9(1) of Copyright Act 1994) |
Eight Mile Investments Ltd v Liu [2025] NZHC 526 at [20] n 10, [22] n 13 and [23] n 14 |
Dicey and Morris on the Conflict of Laws (12th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1993) (re jurisdiction of foreign court) |
H&M Remuera Ltd v Rentmax Ltd [2025] NZHC 369 at [10] n 2 |
Goode and Dixon Goode on Payment Obligations [in] Commercial and Financial Transactions (4th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London 2021) at 5-26 (re payment to agent of creditor) |
Hata v Attorney-General [2025] NZHC 519 at [134] n 83 |
Tucker and others Lewin on Trusts (20th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2020) at [1-061] and [29-062] (re duty of trustee to all beneficiaries) |
Hobson v Hobson [2025] NZHC 494 at [74] n 18 |
Young, Croft and Smith On Equity (Sydney, 2009) at [8.950] (re power of attorney) Watts and Reynolds Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (23rd ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2024) at [6-036] (re power of attorney) |
Kennedy v Body Corporate 82981 [2025] NZHC 388 at [82] n 110 (within a quote) |
Alex Ilkin NSW Strata and Community Schemes Management and the Law (4th ed, Lawbook Co, NSW, 2007) at [115] (re ultra vires acts of bodies corporate) |
Re Joe Raynes Scholarship [2025] NZHC 396 at [20] n 5 |
Henderson, Fowles and Hogan Tudor on Charities (11th/online ed, London) at [21-040] (re amalgamation of trusts) |
Skipper v Gibson – Ngāti Tawhirikura Hapū Charitable Trust (2025) 498 Aotea MB 148 (498 AOT 148) at [15] nn 7 and 8 |
Dal Pont Equity and Trusts in Australia (8th ed, Sydney, 2023) at 863 (re charitable vs private trusts) |
Sole v Hutton [2025] NZHC 430 at [128] n 18 |
Edelman McGregor on Damages (22nd ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2024) at [2.008] (re betterment) Waddams The Law of Damages (5th ed, Canada Law Book, Toronto, 2012) at [1.2730]–[1.2800] (re betterment) |
