Dwan v Trufa Aotearoa Ltd [2025] NZHC 1175 at [46] n 16

Barker “Interim Injunctions” in Civil Remedies in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2011) at [6.2]

[6.2] The initial evidential standard: “a serious question to be tried”

Dwan (above) at [56] n 21

Barker in Civil Remedies in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2011) at [5.2.2(1)]

[5.2.2] Discretionary considerations → (1) Damages are an adequate remedy

Commissioner of Police v Joyce [2025] NZHC 1179 at [35(a)] n 16 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Adams (online ed) at [CA98A.01]

[CA98A.01] “Organised criminal group”

Gaby v Police [2025] NZHC 1186 at [9] n 9

Adams – Sentencing (online ed) at [SAB5.01]

[SAB5.01] Grounds upon which appeal court may uphold appeal

Higgott v Police [2025] NZHC 1388 at [19] n 22

Adams – Sentencing (online looseleaf ed) at [SA9.15(6)]

[SA9.15] Subsection (1)(j) — previous convictions → (6) Proportionality

R v Greig [2025] NZHC 1064 at [36] n 10

Adams – Procedure (online ed) at [CM8A.02]

[CM8A.02] Burden and standard of proof

Reid v District Court at Tauranga [2025] NZHC 1092 at [27] n 5

Adams (online ed) at [CPA147.15]

[CPA147.15] Exceptions to the finality of orders under s 147

Simpson v R [2025] NZHC 1297 at [34] n 31

Adams (online ed) at [SA9.22]

[SA9.22] Subsection (2)(f) — remorse or making amends

Singh v R [2025] NZCA 192 at [9] n 5

Adams – Criminal Procedure (online looseleaf ed) at [CPA230.01]

[CPA230.01] First appeal courts

Southland Regional Council v Clark [2025] NZDC 10552 at [17] n 4

Adams – Criminal Procedure (online looseleaf ed) at [CPA177.01]

[CPA177.01] Court may order retrial or rehearing as to sentence

T (CA449/2023) v R [2025] NZCA 136 at [19] n 4 (judgment contains publication restrictions)

Adams – Evidence (online looseleaf ed) at [EA127.01]

[EA127.01] Discretionary direction concerning “good reason” for delay

Dwan v Trufa Aotearoa Ltd [2025] NZHC 1175 at [56] n 21

McGechan (online ed) at [HR7.53.07(2)–(3)]

See now [HR7.53.06] Second stage of Court’s assessment: “the balance of convenience” → (2) Adequacy of damages for the plaintiff, and (3) Adequacy of damages for the defendant

Everiss v Long [2025] NZHC 1165 at [26] n 4 (within a quote)

McGechan (online ed) at [HR10.2.03]

[HR10.2.03] “For any time, to any place, and upon any terms it thinks just”

LJ Group New Zealand Ltd v New Zealand Capital Management Ltd [2025] NZHC 1071 at [27] n 10

McGechan (online ed) at [HR12.4.01A]

[HR12.4.01A] Application for leave under r 12.4(2)

Professional Conduct Committee v F [2025] NZHC 1026 at [12] n 6

McGechan (online ed) at [HR20.16]

[HR20.16.01] Further evidence on appeal

[HR20.16.02] Requirements for granting leave

[HR20.16.03] Appeals on questions of law

Re Sintes [2025] NZCA 156 at [8] n 1

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [SCD13.04]

[SCD13.04] Third period – after the hearing

Ready v Stedfast [2025] NZHC 1125 at [15] n 1

McGechan (online ed) at [HR15.23.01]

[HR15.23.01] Principles

Reid v District Court at Tauranga [2025] NZHC 1092 at [13] n 1

McGechan (online looseleaf ed) at [HR5.35A]–[HR5.35B]

[HR5.35A.01] Jurisdiction to strike out or stay proceedings before service

[HR5.35A.01A] Which proceedings are covered?

[HR5.35A.02] “plainly abusive proceeding”

[HR5.35B.01] Order to strike out or stay “plainly abusive proceeding” before service

[HR5.35B.02] Procedure

Price v Price [2025] NZHC 1061 at [41] n 6

Company Law (online ed) at [CA174.07]

[CA174.07] Valuation of shares in share acquisition

Harrison v Roberts [2025] NZHC 1327 at [63] nn 11, 13, 14 and 15

Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at 897, 899 and 900

[21.7.2] Inherent jurisdiction

Harrison (above) at [63] n 12

Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at 892

[21.7.1] Concept of jurisdiction

Marine Farming Assoc Inc v Marlborough District Council [2025] NZEnvC 157 at [53] n 33

Joseph (5th ed, 2021) at [23.3.6(3)]

[23.3.6] Rule against sub-delegation → (3) Common law exceptions

Body Corporate 172108 v Cummins [2025] NZHC 1378 at [43] n 62

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [IN37.02]

[IN37.02] Court’s discretion — general principles

Body Corporate 172108 (above) at [100] n 127

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [IN37.04(1) and (2)]

[IN37.04] Ability of the debtor to pay debts → (1) Ability to pay within a reasonable time, and (2) Debtor must provide sufficient evidence of ability to pay

Body Corporate 172108 (above) at [109] n 131

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [IN37.11]

[IN37.11] Matters requiring investigation by Official Assignee

Body Corporate 172108 (above) at [110] n 133

Insolvency Law & Practice (online looseleaf ed) at [IN37.08(1)]

[IN37.08] Adjudication pointless → (1) Absence of assets

R v Deluney (No 2) [2025] NZHC 1341 at [25] n 6 (judgment contains publications restrictions)

Mahoney on Evidence (2nd ed, 2024) at [EV18.02]

[EV18.02] Reliability of the statement

Deluney (No 2) (above) at [27] n 9

Mahoney on Evidence (2nd ed, 2024) at [EV16.03.01(3)]

[EV16.03.01] Indicia of reliability → (3) Paragraph (c): the circumstances relating to the making of the statement

Deluney (No 2) (above) at [27] n 10

Mahoney on Evidence (2nd ed, 2024) at [EV16.03.01(2)]

[EV16.03.01] Indicia of reliability → (2) Paragraph (b): the contents of the statement

Graves v Dillon [2025] NZHC 1278 at [73] n 48 (judgment contains publications restrictions)

Family Law – Family Property (online ed) at [pr44.04c(3)(d)] [sic]

See [PR44C.04] Requirements → (3) Disposition of relationship property → (d) Examples

Harrison v Roberts [2025] NZHC 1327 at [25] n 1

Law of Insolvency in New Zealand (2nd ed, 2021) at [50.1] and [50.3]

[50.1] Introduction

[50.3] UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-border insolvency

Blight v Colville [2025] NZCA 188 at [22] n 8

Hughes “Interference with Business Relations” in Todd (ed) The Law of Torts in New Zealand (5th ed, 2009) 601 at [13.2]

See now [12.2] Inducing breach of contract

Complete Shelf Co No 8 Ltd v Christchurch City Council [2025] NZHC 1242 at [44] n 11

Todd (9th ed, 2023) at [4.4.8] [sic]

See [4.8.4] Reliance

Nicholas v Carter [2025] NZHC 1376 at [15] n 4

Todd (9th ed, 2023) at [9.2.1]

[9.2.1] Generally

Nicholas v Carter [2025] NZHC 1376 at [11] n 1

New Zealand Land Law (3rd ed, 2017) at [10.4.01(b)] [sic]

See [10.4.01] Rights of way → (6) Interference with right of way

LJ Group New Zealand Ltd v New Zealand Capital Management Ltd [2025] NZHC 1071 at [85] n 29

Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance in New Zealand (2004) at 148

[7.5] When does oppression exist? → [7.5.3] Accepted considerations → (8) Manner of exercise of the power of sale

Storageone Metro Ltd v Tempja (NZ) Ltd [2025] NZHC 1025 at [14] n 1 and [49] n 20

Mitchell, Mitchell and Watterson (eds) Goff and Jones on Unjust Enrichment (10th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2022) at [6-124] (re “interceptive subtractions”)

Storageone Metro (above) at [39] n 16

Palmer Palmer on Bailment (3rd ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2009) at [13-001] (re involuntary bailees)

Wenzhou Hongliang Trading Co Ltd v Williams [2025] NZHC 1029 at [46] n 26 (within a quote)

Murray and Harris Keay’s Insolvency: Personal and Corporate Law and Practice (8th ed, Lawbook Co, Sydney, 2014) at [6.195] (appropriate respect/weight re Official Assignee’s conclusions)