Skip to main content

Traumatised, violated and vulnerable

privacy law in New ZealandThere’s a car accident. It’s horrendous enough as it is. The driver is dead and the passenger is in intensive care with an uncertain prognosis. But photographs and video clips of the wreckage make it more so.

Suddenly they’re everywhere: on the internet in social media and other websites, in newspapers, and live “on the scene” footage is shown on prime time television.

Who gave permission to show private pain to the world?

And who cares anyway?

Jennifer Moore does. In the extract below she discusses privacy law in relation to accident victims in New Zealand.

TRAUMATISED BODIES: TOWARDS CORPOREALITY IN NEW ZEALAND’S PRIVACY TORT LAW INVOLVING ACCIDENT SURVIVORS

(2011) 24 NZULR 386

"This article combines several different literatures (legal, medical and theoretical) in order to explore privacy law cases which involve accident survivors. I adopt an inductive methodology which emphasises the accident survivors’ experiences. Their accounts demonstrate their position of special vulnerability. However, accident survivors currently receive inadequate protection because the New Zealand privacy tort does not recognise their special vulnerable status. The accident survivors’ privacy claim in Andrews v TVNZ, for example, failed because the Court held that the publication was not highly offensive. The legal status quo is problematic because accident survivors whose privacy has been breached expect the law to provide protection at a time when they are vulnerable and unable to protect themselves. The privacy intrusions experienced by accident survivors cause adverse health outcomes. Alternative perspectives from theoretical and empirical medicine reveal the extent of the problem and help to suggest necessary reforms. This literature justifies recognising accident survivors as a special class of plaintiffs. New Zealand’s privacy tort could be reformed by presuming that they have a reasonable expectation of privacy and that images of accidents are distressing and humiliating."

Source New Zealand Universities Law Review – Volume 24, Number 3, June 2011

The abstract comes from the most recent edition of the New Zealand Universities Law Review  which is  available for subscription online.

The online journal contains the same content as its offline or paper counterpart. You can access all volumes dating back to 1997.  However online search functionality with  links to relevant legislation and cases makes  research easier.

 The New Zealand Legal Writing Index has also been released online; that's over 12,000 journal articles from 1954 to the present day and growing. Its index provides direct links to articles that are part of your Brookers Online journals subscription.

For more information about Journals Online please contact either:

By Susan Dugdale

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.